← Search

Pamela Armstrong

— year-end
42 matches · 34W–8L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Armstrong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-07-27 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Bitter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Fair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
L
2026-05-25 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-15 · NEW:The Smashers:Page/van Vliet · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-2
W
2025-07-10 · NEW:Overserved:Colcord/Zizza · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-01 · NEW:The Smashers:Page/van Vliet · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-30 · NEW:Newburyport:Sullivan/Quigley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Dobkowski
2025-06-26 · NEW:Overserved:Colcord/Zizza · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-06-24 · NEW:The Smashers:Page/van Vliet · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
85.7%
30W–5L · 65.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 67% of the time
#1 Singles
67%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams