← Search

Edison Penafiel

Rockville, MD
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 179W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edison Penafiel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Leader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Leader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Corey Glocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Pratt - Great Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheila O'Connell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laith Layous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-01 · Pratt - Great Sets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Leader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · Pratt - Great Sets · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Leader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Derek Ireland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Pratt - Great Sets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Regina Farrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · Miletti · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Bichy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
85.7%
30W–5L · 65.8% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.2% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
88.1%
59W–8L · 67.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
44W–40L · 51% of games
8.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
132 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
61 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams