← Search

Jasmine Lee

Holmdel, NJ
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 26W–45L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Jasmine Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2023-02-03 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Mangarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2023-01-06 · Bad Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Buchan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Collard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-11-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-11-04 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Nijnens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Cicalese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-10-18 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-10-14 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gerilyn Mahlof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cantaffa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2022-09-30 · Bad Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Nijnens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Yrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.2% of games
3.0
43.9%
25W–32L · 47.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
18%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer