← Search

David Vant Hof

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 89W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Vant Hof to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-06-13 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bart Borosky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · PTC-Borosky · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arthur Kowitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Shen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eugene Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Sturdyvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-27 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-12 · IRV-Lux · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-11 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-03 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · N OR-CAC-McGarity · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Francisco Rivera-Giusti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
81.8%
27W–6L · 63.7% of games
4.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 49.2% of games
8.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.8% of games
9.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King