← Search

Dean Moore

Newark, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 11W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dean Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Cahill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-3
L
2026-07-13 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Over Served · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Sickels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · Over Served · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
David Pearl / David Knight
2026-04-22 · Over Served · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Sickels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Bruce Burcat / Stephen Johnson
2025-05-29 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rytas Vebeliunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Bouscaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim McCarley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Walck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
31.4%
11W–24L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams