← Search

Mary Jean Waite

— year-end
148 matches · 88W–60L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mary Jean Waite to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-09-11 · CP-Fearless & Fun-Carlson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marisa Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Love 'Em or Lob 'Em Redux · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Borgonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Love 'Em or Lob 'Em Redux · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Borgonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · Love 'Em or Lob 'Em Redux · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Borgonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · CP-Victorious-Dauphiny Becker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Mama Waite · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · CP-Victorious-Dauphiny Becker · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · CP-Victorious-Dauphiny Becker · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.3% of games
3.0
65.7%
46W–24L · 56.2% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 42.7% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#1 Singles
24%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#2 Singles
10%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova