← Search

Philip Oh

— year-end
93 matches · 60W–33L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Philip Oh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2024-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chanaka Amarasinghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-0
W
2024-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chanaka Amarasinghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-2
L
2024-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Mcisaac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chanaka Amarasinghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-1
W
2024-03-30 · Warren Ballers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wiktor Walasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-03-23 · Warren Ballers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wiktor Walasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2024-03-16 · Warren Ballers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Cullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-02-07 · Warren Ballers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milind Khade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Wilen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
CHETAN CHAWADA / Ankush Kumar
2023-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milind Khade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mukesh Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milind Khade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
Teams16 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
86.1%
31W–5L · 61.4% of games
4.0
41.4%
12W–17L · 49.3% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams