← Search

Joanne Hopmeyer

Flagstaff, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 27W–59L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Joanne Hopmeyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Rice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Rice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
Alan Sherry / Ruthie Tipp
2026-07-05 · NAZ/Steigerwald/40&over/3.0mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Cooperrider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · NAZ/Steigerwald/40&over/3.0mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Rice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Garard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Garard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Fule
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Garard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Garard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Nicol · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Garard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roberta Bloss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roberta Bloss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-08 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-11-09 · Chan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
33.9%
21W–41L · 43% of games
6.0
50%
4W–4L · 43.1% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams