← Search

Brent Berry

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 11W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brent Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Da.Wascher40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Da.Wascher18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Reid Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Da.Wascher40S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · Jo.Cockerham40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Dudeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Ti.Koves18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Wascher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Ti.Koves18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradford Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Ti.Koves18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · Da.Wascher40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Mize
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Da.Wascher40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-15 · Da.Wascher40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Wascher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · Da.Wascher40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Garland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-18 · Da.Wascher40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathaniel Turck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 35.2% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams