← Search

Craig Masur

Centennial, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 50W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Masur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-08-31 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Schrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-17 · WC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ben Purvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Parmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Muhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isaac Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isaac Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · WC RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Gagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Schrandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Nevener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Mosch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-5
L
2026-05-28 · WC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Nevener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 41% of games
3.0
48.4%
45W–48L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
5.3%
1W–18L · 28.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert