← Search

Mark Felgner

— year-end
270 matches · 154W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Felgner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-09-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-09-03 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · NWO 55&Over 7.0MX Jacobs-SVC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · NWO 55&Over 7.0M O’Reilly-Southview · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Koroush Sheikhi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Dhariwal/Patel -Jermain · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sriram Kattoju
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Andrew Morgan
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Jacobs-Southview · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · NWO 40&Over 3.0M Patel/Naus-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paresh Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · NWO 40&Over 3.0M Patel/Naus-Jermain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Langsdorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · NWO 18&Over 3.0M Jacobs-Southview · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Dhariwal/Patel -Jermain · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Girts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · NWO 40&Over 3.0M Patel/Naus-Jermain · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Langsdorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
59.8%
58W–39L · 55.7% of games
3.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 41.4% of games
6.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.1% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.7%
41W–17L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.3%
19W–22L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
79 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer