← Search

James Webb

Sandy Hook, CT
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 51W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Webb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-06-20 · MIL: Seasoned Servers: Consiglio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefanie Kreiger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · MIL: Seasoned Servers: Consiglio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbi Deangelis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-5
L
2025-11-15 · MIT:Milford Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Rivera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-03 · MIT:Milford Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-09-26 · MIT: 40+ Mixed 6.0:Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Scully mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-12 · MIT:Milford Kreiger/Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefanie Kreiger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-09-05 · MIT: 40+ Mixed 6.0:Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ila Osach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-26 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ray Cerritelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Diane Sullivan / Brian McCauley
2024-12-14 · MIT:Mixologists:Lorenzetti/Kreiger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haven mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-10-25 · MIT: 40+ Mixed 6.0:Mcvoy/Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arla Wiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-05 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wayne Billingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-09-29 · MIT:3.0 40+:McVoy / Lorenzetti · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ray Cerritelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
38.5%
20W–32L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
51.9%
28W–26L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe