← Search

Alan Blair

Albuquerque, NM
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 79W–102L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Alan Blair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Adult 40 & Over 4.0M Howell - TCA · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Scisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · 55 & Over 8.0M Min - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Madeyski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · 55 & Over 8.0M Min - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Madeyski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · 55 & Over 8.0M Min - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Kunzler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · 55 & Over 8.0M Min - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Burnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · 40 & Over 4.0X Hagemann - TCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda von Boetticher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · 55 & Over 8.0M Min - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Madeyski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · 40 & Over 4.0X Hagemann - TCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Taylor-Noren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · 40 & Over 4.0X Hagemann - TCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Turpie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-19 · 40 & Over 4.0X Hagemann - TCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda von Boetticher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · 40 & Over 4.0X Hagemann - TCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Woodfin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · 18 & Over 4.0M Howell - JC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Tronzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 55.3% of games
4.0
30.2%
13W–30L · 45.8% of games
7.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.8% of games
8.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.6% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
31.4%
11W–24L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams