← Search

Ashley Santacroce

Sylvania, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Ashley Santacroce to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2025-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cody/Sofo -SCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Karen Knemeyer / Patricia Smith
2025-06-25 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Day Gabel/O’Connell-SCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Huntzinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Day Gabel/O’Connell-SCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-02 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Cody/Sofo -SCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Jennifer Smith / Renee Reaume
2025-05-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Day Gabel/O’Connell-SCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Pilgrim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-21 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Day Gabel/O’Connell-SCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Lewinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-1, 0-1
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-6
L
2025-02-18 · NWO 6.5W Combo Spring Gabel/O’Connell- Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erica Skiver
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-29 · NWO Combo 6.5W Tues Gabel/O'Connell-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Krebs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2024-07-31 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Gabel/O'Connell-SCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Krebs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-07-17 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W DAY Gabel/O'Connell-SCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Krebs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.4% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova