← Search

Jennifer Naponelli

GRANGER, IN
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 21W–41L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Jennifer Naponelli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2024-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Seabaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Susie Brennan / Hannah Davis
2024-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sunderlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
Michelle Shakour / Aimee Sharpe
2024-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sunderlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Christine Diss / Carmen Ramirez
2024-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sunderlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
Katie Harshman / Jennifer McAward
2024-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sunderlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
Michelle Engel / Katy Orenchuk
2023-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Sunderlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Meggan Ross / Katie Powell
2023-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2023-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
12W–0L · 77% of games
3.0
7.7%
2W–24L · 29.2% of games
5.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.3% of games
6.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 25.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova