← Search

Michelle Larson

— year-end
75 matches · 58W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michelle Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-03-22 · Elysium 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minako Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-09-26 · Kern/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-09-19 · Kern/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-18 · Kern/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-10 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hope Suhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-27 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hope Suhor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-08-25 · Rosenfeld/18/6.5/CWN/UC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carmen Lavergne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-08-19 · Kern/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-10 · Wallace/18/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Silvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · Kern/18/6.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · Padial/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mimi Shoenfelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-07-09 · Padial/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Gazmen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
90.9%
30W–3L · 71% of games
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 56.2% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Singles
15%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams