← Search

Craig Menninger

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 30W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Craig Menninger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-08-25 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rod Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · KMacrone/KKuehner (Alexander St Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Kuehner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Carney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Carney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · KMacrone/KKuehner (Alexander St Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · KMacrone/KKuehner (Alexander St Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Megginson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Clune mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · KMacrone/KKuehner (Alexander St Park) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Kuehner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · TZimmer (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 53.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 59.4% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams