Cheryl Ingram
Bonita Springs, FL
187 matches · 116W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Cheryl Ingram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history187 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-1, 1-0
W
Alja Hessami-Maas / Kelly Cosgrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
Erin Wyatt / Michelle Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams102 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 14.MTB Yaffe Sun 4 $29
CHI E 40W3.5 9.MTB Greeley Sat 4 $29
CHI E 40W4.0 3.ACN Burnside Sat 4 $24
CHI E 55W7.0 6.RCLB Eichner Sun 6 $25
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 12MTB Yaffe Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 11MTB Greeley Sat 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 7Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 4RCLB Eichner Sun 4 $22
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 11.MTB(OUT) Yaffe Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 9.MTB Greeley Sun 12 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $22
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 7.RCLB Eichner Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 11.MTB Yaffe Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 9.MTB Greeley Sat 4 $27
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
Heritage Bay / K. Keillor
Heritage Bay / K. Keillor
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
Palmira / Fontana
Palmira / Fontana
StoneCreek / Palmieri
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.2% of games
3.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 59.8% of games
3.5
61%
50W–32L · 53% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.7% of games
7.0
73.9%
34W–12L · 60% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 34.2% of games
8.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Singles
16%
29 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.