← Search

Victoria Ness

— year-end
30 matches · 18W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Victoria Ness to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-08-09 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denis Diehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-05 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David AuCoin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David AuCoin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denis Diehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Garlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-21 · CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Banes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lou Eftimoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 63.6% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer