← Search

Eric Klein

Waban, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 83W–55L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Eric Klein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-09-13 · LFNT:Net Results:Klein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Felicia Mathias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · LFW:Wayland Green:Klein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-06-01 · LFW:Wayland Green:Klein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Bannatyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · LFW:Wayland Green:Klein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Newfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · LFW:Wayland:Pinto · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-4, 1-0
L
Bruce Rachman / Greg Smith
2026-05-11 · LFW:Wayland Green:Klein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Bannatyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · LFNT:Longfellow Red Natick:Andrade/De Lasse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Felicia Mathias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-06 · LFW:Way:Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon:Zhou · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Ogura mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.9%
41W–16L · 55.2% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.3%
38W–22L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
17%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer