← Search

Daniel Jing

Madison, WI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 36W–9L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Daniel Jing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Elias-Hurst (F) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Samto Wongso / Nick Long
2026-06-17 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M MALT Mercurio · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Quinlivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5M MALT Leung · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Kevin Johnson
2026-06-03 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M MALT Mercurio · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5M MALT Leung · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M MALT Mercurio · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Jacob Chapman
2026-05-20 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M MALT Mercurio · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5M MALT Leung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Deetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
Joshua Brown / Jay Warrick
2026-03-10 · WI Mid Tri M Doubles MALT Akyuz · #3 Doubles · with Erik Deetz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 66.1% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer