← Search

Adam Embler

Cameron, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 30W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Embler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Coker - Glenville Lake (FAY) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zeickia Ledwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Coker - Glenville Lake (FAY) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zeickia Ledwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Coker - Glenville Lake (FAY) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nirav Bhavsar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · NMAC.Orlowski · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · NMAC.Orlowski · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Sistare - Glenville Lake · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ericka Zumwalt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · NMAC.Orlowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Jennifer Hill / Wesley Greenwood
2026-06-28 · Sistare - Glenville Lake · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Sistare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · NMAC.Orlowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · NMAC.Orlowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-21 · NMAC.Orlowski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-22 · Coker - Methodist University · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 54.2% of games
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 50% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.6% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
26 matches
#2 Singles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe