Rachael Seeger
Portland, OR
58 matches · 26W–32L · seasons 2019–2024
Captains: add Rachael Seeger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history58 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
45.6%
26W–31L · 49.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.