← Search

Michelle Finley

— year-end
91 matches · 41W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michelle Finley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Finley: FTO · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rory Osberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · Finley: FTO · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Twedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Finley: FTO · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rory Osberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Bartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Bartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Kuberski - Underdogs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with T.J. Majdecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Bartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Seifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Bartz/Tollefson Fireballers 8.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with T.J. Majdecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-30 · Anderson/Nguyen/Summers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Kuberski - Underdogs · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with T.J. Majdecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Bartz/Tollefson Fireballers 8.0 40+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with T.J. Majdecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Teams94 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
49.2%
30W–31L · 50% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36%
9W–16L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert