← Search

Robert Ford

— year-end
146 matches · 116W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robert Ford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Crosstown Connection · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2026-07-19 · Highland Park · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Kozar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · Highland Park · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
W
2026-07-18 · Crosstown Connection · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Chirdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Corder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · Crosstown Connection · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Meyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcin Strojwas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Crosstown Connection · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Will
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Highland Park · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with RASHID HASSAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-12-20 · Crosstown Connection · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Meyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-12-14 · Crosstown Connection · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.1% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
95.2%
20W–1L · 64% of games
4.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
20W–0L · 67.3% of games
7.5mixed
100%
14W–0L · 63.8% of games
8.0mixed
70.6%
24W–10L · 55.5% of games
8.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer