← Search

Philip Green

— year-end
43 matches · 29W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philip Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-07-16 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · Lassow / Walker 18+ S 26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aloisio Lovo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert MacHalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Henry Finch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Bjorn Bjorklund / Chris Johnson
2026-06-11 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Sprinkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-09 · Lassow / Walker 18+ S 26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aloisio Lovo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · Craig/Lassow - S26 Double Bagel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nils Stefan Pettersson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-06 · Lassow/Walker 18+ W 26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-0
W
2025-12-15 · Craig/Lassow Net Hounds · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-12-04 · Craig/Lassow ES 26 Double Bagel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Sprinkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-12-01 · Craig/Lassow Net Hounds · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert MacHalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-20 · Craig/Lassow Net Hounds · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.8% of games
4.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 26% of the time
#3 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova