← Search

Yan Omen

— year-end
183 matches · 92W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yan Omen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
W
2026-07-16 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marilee Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carmela Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · NACC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reem Ghanem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalia Sztryk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Dreven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Normalyn Emoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Lauren Donohue / Katie Chapman
2026-04-12 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Normalyn Emoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Normalyn Emoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
2026-03-01 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Normalyn Emoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reem Ghanem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
59.4%
38W–26L · 53.8% of games
3.5
59.6%
34W–23L · 53.8% of games
4.0
27.1%
13W–35L · 40.7% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#2 Singles
13%
24 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams