← Search

David Fletcher

Atlanta, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 8W–23L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add David Fletcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sawyer Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheldon Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheldon Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Waterbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-01-28 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Waterbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-13 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Waterbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 6-7
W
2025-08-09 · Team Kester (CONFIRMED) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
L
2025-08-09 · Team Kester (CONFIRMED) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
2025-08-09 · Team Kester (CONFIRMED) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Heeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-9
L
2025-07-13 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-15 · Piedmont Park (Beau Talley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.7% of games
4.0
17.4%
4W–19L · 41.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 52% of the time
#1 Singles
52%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova