← Search

Danny Degnan

— year-end
64 matches · 23W–41L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Danny Degnan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2022-05-19 · NWO 18&Over 3.5 Men Kelso/Jachimiak-Springfield HS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-11-07 · NWO Combo 6.5M Jachimiak/Kelso- · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-10-10 · NWO Combo 6.5M Jachimiak/Kelso- · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Patrick Jones / Kurtis Winzenried
2021-10-03 · NWO Combo 6.5M Jachimiak/Kelso- · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-07-15 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Renner -TTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-24 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Renner -TTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2021-05-24 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Renner -TTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Tietje
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2021-05-13 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Renner -TTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Walbolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2020-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
L
2020-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shane Parendo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3, 0-1
L
2020-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Kelso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2020-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shane Parendo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–6L · 34.2% of games
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.2% of games
3.5
16.7%
4W–20L · 32.3% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 47.8% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal