← Search

Michelle Ludwiczak

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 95W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michelle Ludwiczak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-09-11 · KLull (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paulina Coello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-07 · KHart (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katy Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-04 · KLull (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jami Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-02 · SLind (Bridgehampton) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Eberhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · KHart (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tara Tyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · KLull (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paulina Coello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · SLind (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Butkovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Ashley Wise / Elizabeth Murphy
2026-08-14 · KLull (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jami Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · SLind (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Lind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · KHart (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katy Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Garrity
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-27 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.2% of games
3.5
54.5%
30W–25L · 53.2% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 41% of games
6.5
62.8%
27W–16L · 58.6% of games
7.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 65.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer