← Search

Peter DiPasquale

— year-end
110 matches · 41W–69L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Peter DiPasquale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-09-13 · The Bagel Shop/Hoffman/Tume · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kayla Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-30 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Pazirandeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Pazirandeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Pazirandeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simon Khilkevich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · WR Senior Ballers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-18 · WR Senior Ballers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Blackmoore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-17 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Colon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · Wood Ranch Tri Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Roaquin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Mission Oaks Foes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Colon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ilan Elkabetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams76 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 49.9% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 38.6% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.9% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
11W–22L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova