← Search

Erin Roach

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 39W–70L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Erin Roach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-09-09 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vicki King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Hollifield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vicki King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-20 · ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kalia Macy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Loor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Hollifield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Morgan Hoecherl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · ACheek/SJPragasam (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zak Gilbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · ACheek/SJPragasam (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Ng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Annabel Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · SJPragasam/KLoor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Kirschner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 50% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.1% of games
4.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 39.7% of games
6.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 49% of games
7.5
35%
7W–13L · 45.9% of games
3.5mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer