← Search

William Liebel

— year-end
54 matches · 16W–38L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add William Liebel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-09-10 · CCRC/Mahoney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ross Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · CCRC/Mahoney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · William Liebel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · William Liebel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-12 · William Liebel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · NTC - Dowdey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sunitha Zechariah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · William Liebel · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-19 · CSRATA/Gregory Mahoney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ivan Florentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-12 · CSRATA/Gregory Mahoney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ivan Florentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-22 · CSRATA/Gregory Mahoney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-13 · CCRC - Mahoney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julian Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-06 · CCRC - Mahoney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julian Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
42.1%
16W–22L · 47.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–16L · 17.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Singles
30%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams