← Search

Ibelise Castro

Macon, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 55W–38L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Ibelise Castro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-08-20 · RN-Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hollie Nepveux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · RN-Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · JDS-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-22 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-13 · JDS-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Ellwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-09 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-07 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Debbie Davis / Vickie Banker
2026-04-06 · JDS-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wanda Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yvonne Apodaca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · JDS-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Ellwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · MATA/Debbie Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
64%
48W–27L · 55.9% of games
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova