← Search

Jill Boyce

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 150W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jill Boyce to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history242 matches
W
2026-09-13 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothea Barnatan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-12 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Ferschweiler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sid Ramachandran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rajan Madhusudan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rajan Madhusudan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · SAC-Gatzke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toni Lipke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · SAC-Gatzke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Yeung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · SAC-Gatzke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toni Lipke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-18 · SAC-Gatzke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · SAC-Gatzke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Tom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-05 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Ferschweiler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 63.9% of games
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 56.8% of games
3.5
38.2%
21W–34L · 45.8% of games
7.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
87.9%
29W–4L · 70.5% of games
7.0mixed
60.8%
31W–20L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#1 Singles
22%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams