← Search

Barbara Rayll

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 14W–54L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Barbara Rayll to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Coker-Woodson/LF/40&over3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara McKillip
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Darla Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-06 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-14 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-17 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Rebecca Lewis
2025-09-04 · declined: Carr/LF/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-03 · Gilbert/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracie Pelotte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2024-11-25 · Swiggett/LF · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-11 · Swiggett/LF · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-11-06 · Gilbert/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Kurin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.4% of games
3.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.4% of games
3.5
19.4%
7W–29L · 36.8% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 21% of the time
#1 Singles
21%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert