← Search

Spencer Byrd

Fairview, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 88W–50L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Spencer Byrd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-12 · GLVR-Byrd/Gill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Partch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Fullhart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Fullhart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · NOR-Trakoolthai · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Fullhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · NOR-Trakoolthai · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · NOR-Trakoolthai · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Fullhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · NOR-Trakoolthai · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · NOR-Trakoolthai · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Fullhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Reizes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · CAC-Deems · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sergio Jara Arroyos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · PTC-Byrd/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cory Heisterkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
21W–7L · 62.7% of games
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 64% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
16W–16L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#1 Male Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal