← Search

Lisa Chang

Orlando, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 84W–68L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lisa Chang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-06-05 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Silvia Landgraf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-01 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
L
2026-05-15 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-05-08 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-04 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-27 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-23 · USTA Campus-Alvarez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · USTA Campus-Sipio · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanha Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.5% of games
3.5
51.7%
45W–42L · 49.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
9W–6L · 51.7% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.5% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
10%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova