← Search

ANN GRAY

Pasadena, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 4W–17L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add ANN GRAY to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-05-13 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-08 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Alberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · SGV Fired up Flint-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/W12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Shore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Ono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jady Vonderlieth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Lund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-04 · SGV LA Lobsters-McNulty-Flint/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Janisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
SUSAN PEDERSON / Eva Revesz
2025-09-20 · SGV LA Lobsters-McNulty-Flint/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Janisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-14 · SGV LA Lobsters-McNulty-Flint/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pashayan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hodge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
Sang Ur / Susan Lee
2025-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 29.3% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert