← Search

Nicole Stoker Evans

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 149W–112L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Nicole Stoker Evans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history261 matches
L
2025-05-03 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Berkovits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-17 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Janda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-14 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Berkovits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-12 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine McPeak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Ryan / Denise Antoniadis
2025-03-22 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-16 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Janda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2025-03-08 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-03-01 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marrian Fujinami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-24 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-02-22 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Creamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-10 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cerny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-02-08 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 66.6% of games
3.5
77%
47W–14L · 60.7% of games
4.0
49.5%
45W–46L · 53.8% of games
4.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 43.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.6% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
72 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova