← Search

Caraline Annichiarico

Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 33W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Caraline Annichiarico to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-07-07 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Slaughter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Slaughter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Brown/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Slaughter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-05 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-22 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Keathley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-14 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with LoisAnn Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2026-04-07 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emy Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-04 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emy Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Manasco/Cahill/Bryant/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emy Roux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Olivia Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
100%
9W–0L · 68.7% of games
4.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 65.5% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova