← Search

Amber Dyer

MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 44W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Dyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-04-22 · LCTA40/Harrison/MPR · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Ann Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · LCTA18/Tinker/DunesWest · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Passman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/Harrison/MPR · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Kuehmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-23 · LCTA18/Tinker/DunesWest · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Passman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · LCTA40/Billings/Dunes West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Mammele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-11 · LCTA40/Harrison/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-04 · LCTA40/Harrison/MPR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-02 · LCTA18/Tinker/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Pretorius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · LCTA18/Tinker/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trudy Billings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · LCTA40/Billings/Dunes West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Hannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-29 · LCTA40/Billings/Dunes West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Pretorius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-28 · LCTA40/Harrison/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leila Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
42.9%
24W–32L · 45.5% of games
3.0
19.3%
16W–67L · 39.5% of games
3.5
0%
0W–12L · 26.7% of games
5.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#2 Singles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
10%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe