← Search

Kathryn Marsden

— year-end
39 matches · 22W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Marsden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2025-10-05 · MIT:Smashed:Milano/Montanaro · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Rullo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-19 · MIT:Make it a Double:Milano/Marsden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Rullo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-10-09 · MIT:Milford Magnolias:Nava/Nolan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-23 · MIT:Sorry, Not Sorry:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-21 · MIT:Sorry, Not Sorry:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-03-04 · MIT:Jr. Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Valiquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-02-27 · MIT:BCC Beavers:Milano/Mardsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-02-26 · MIT:BCC Beavers:Milano/Mardsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Nierman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-02-17 · MIT:Jr. Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Valiquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-02-05 · MIT:BCC Beavers:Milano/Mardsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Rullo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-01-23 · MIT:Sugar Magnolias:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Montanaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2021-11-06 · MIT:BCC Beavers:Milano/Mardsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geoff Stowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 70.1% of games
3.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe