← Search

Tina Jacob

— year-end
101 matches · 22W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tina Jacob to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-02-20 · Racquet Club 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · Racquet Club 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Michelle Gorring / Karen Meyer
2025-11-21 · Racquet Club 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-24 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-20 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lena Furci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Megan Brown / Beth Wicker
2025-10-10 · Racquet Club 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-12 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-05 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-02 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Vasileff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-11 · Racquet Club 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Ciesinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
22.4%
17W–59L · 38.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.3% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 20% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer