← Search

Elisia van Scoter

Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 58W–42L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Elisia van Scoter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Reeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Reeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · Milton TC (Brandy Hoffmeister)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael van Scoter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Milton TC (Brandy Hoffmeister)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael van Scoter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · Milton TC (Brandy Hoffmeister)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael van Scoter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · Westbrook (Erin Fowler)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elissa Denham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-16 · Wexford (Alison O'Connell)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Strahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-01-16 · Westbrook (Erin Fowler)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz North
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-15 · Milton TC (Wendy Henslee)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Henslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · Milton TC (Wendy Henslee)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Keeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 72.7% of games
3.5
60%
39W–26L · 53.2% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.4% of games
3.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova