← Search

Jennifer Barney

Larchmont, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 75W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Barney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · with Erica MacGregor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · with Denise Regan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Loll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · MBYC 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Loll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica MacGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Dana Schwarcz / Mili Brown
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica MacGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · MBYC 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Loll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-14 · Sportime HI - Armada UNITED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Rende
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Elizabeth McGoldrick / Fran Torres
2025-12-09 · #1 Doubles · with Erica MacGregor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-25 · Sportime HI: Armada · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica MacGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-21 · Sportime HI: Armada · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica MacGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-29 · Sportime HI --Armada UNITED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Hofmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 50.9% of games
3.0
58.4%
52W–37L · 56.7% of games
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova