← Search

Dennis Krijt

CHESTERBROOK, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 113W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dennis Krijt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-07-03 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajeev Rao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Any Given Saturday · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Diorio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Beh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · UMLY United 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Any Given Saturday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Henrik Svensson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Thanh Nguyen / Indrajeet Joglekar
2026-06-09 · UMLY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Penwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Any Given Saturday · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Leighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Chris Shaw / Stephanie Suran
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Paige Jankowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hui Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · UMLY United 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · Any Given Saturday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Francesco Grimaldi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · UMLY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.7% of games
4.0
48.4%
30W–32L · 49.4% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
60.6%
43W–28L · 52.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer