← Search

Carolyn Cottle

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 113W–130L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Cottle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Stokes-Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Williams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Criddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Stokes-Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-29 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Williams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Stokes-Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanette Shepard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Stokes-Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Williams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Celia Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · Cottonwood Club-Annunziata · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-2
L
2026-05-20 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Williams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Annunziata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · Cottonwood Club-Annunziata · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Annunziata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
40%
10W–15L · 47.4% of games
3.5
50.6%
80W–78L · 49.6% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 29.1% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.7% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 35.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 44.7% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
20 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe