← Search

Amy Kippels

Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 64W–30L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Amy Kippels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathi Levinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathi Levinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nevada Serra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-3
L
Andrea Nugent / Sara Anderson
2026-06-28 · Glastonberry (Sharon Claytor)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shay Brasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Glastonberry (Sharon Claytor)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaimee Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-17 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie de la Rosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Amy Cho / Sun Kim
2026-02-10 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nevada Serra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-17 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nevada Serra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.6% of games
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.6% of games
3.5
64.1%
41W–23L · 56% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert