← Search

Mike Reidelbach

— year-end
67 matches · 21W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Reidelbach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-03-28 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Isaac Rose / Mitchell Bakos
2026-03-14 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-14 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Hitler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-07 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Andrew Esposito / Mitchell Bakos
2026-01-31 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-09 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-08 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-20 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Animesh Narayan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-29 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Dvorak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-22 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Dvorak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-15 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Dvorak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3, 1-0
L
David Reed / Nick Nieset
2025-02-22 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oscar Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
32.8%
21W–43L · 42.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer